Friday 30 October 2009

Kampung Buah Pala: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is the background to the Kampung Buah Pala dispute?

Kampung Buah Pala is a small village in Bukit Gelugor, Penang. It is inhabited mostly by Indians who are the descendants of plantation workers and cattlemen of the former Brown Estate. The village is popularly nicknamed ‘High Chaparral’ due to its elevated location on Bukit Gelugor. The land on which Kampung Buah Pala is located was given in trust to the government of the Straits Settlement by Helen Margaret Brown, the landowner of the Brown Estate, before returning to Britain in 1956. The land given in trust was then transferred to the state government which subsequently provided temporary occupation licenses (TOL) to the villagers who paid an annual TOL rental.

When did the TOL arrangement for Kampung Buah Pala land change?

In 2005, the previous Gerakan/Barisan Nasional state government stopped collecting rent for the TOL. This gave rise to residents’ suspicions that something was amiss.

Who sold the land to Koperasi Pegawai-Pegawai Kanan Kerajaan Pulau Pinang (Koperasi) and how much was it sold for?

The previous Gerakan/BN state government sold the Kampung Buah Pala land to Koperasi Pegawai-Pegawai Kanan Kerajaan Pulau Pinang(Koperasi). This decision was indicated in the executive council meeting minutes dated 18 August 2004 and 8 June 2005. It was undertaken without consulting the residents. Initially a premium of RM6.42 million (or RM20 per square feet) was agreed. However, these figures were later reduced further still to a premium of RM3.21 (or RM10 per square feet) under the recommendation of the UMNO Deputy Chief Minister, Datuk Abdul Rashid Abdullah – a reduction of 50 per cent. The decision was taken with the unanimous support from all the BN executive council members – Gerakan, United Malays National Organisation (UMNO), Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA) and Malaysian Indian Congress (MIC).

A video clip shows Dato’ Seri Abdul Rashid Abdullah, the former Deputy Chief Minister in 2007, witnessing the signing ceremony between Koperasi and the developer. Letters were issued in 2006 giving development orders before issuance of title and that the land would revert “absolutely” to the Koperasi upon payment of land premium without any mention of a specific time frame.

When was the land transfer completed?

The title to the Kampung Buah Pala land was finally transferred to the Koperasi on 27 March 2008.

Are the Kampung Buah Pala residents victims of a Gerakan/BN land scam?

Yes. Since the prevailing market rate in 2005 was at least RM50 per square feet, the price offered by the Penang Gerakan/BN state government was obviously significantly below what should have been offered to the residents. Further, even the paltry initial offer of RM20 per square feet was reduced by 50 per cent.

What was offered in terms of compensation to the residents?

The Gerakan/BN state government and the developer offered each household RM1,000 in relocation expenses and a flat unit worth RM75,000. This was done on the basis that the residents were not ‘illegal squatters’. In contrast the PR managed to obtain RM 8,000 relocation expenses and a double-storey landed property with 99 year lease worth RM 600,000/-.

What is the role of the current DAP/Pakatan Rakyat state government in the land transfer?

The current DAP/Pakatan Rakyat Chief Minister, Y.A.B. Lim Guan Eng, has not given a single approval or signed a single document in favour of Koperasi or developer. All the approvals and development orders were approved and signed during the administration of former Chief Minister, Dr Koh Tsu Koon and his executive councillors.

Why has the current DAP/Pakatan Rakyat state government not been able to stop the land title transfer?

This matter was decided by the Federal Court in favour of the Koperasi and developer. The land transfer was consequent to the approvals given by the previous Gerakan/BN administration. Once the decision of the previous executive council had been conveyed by approval letters for land alienation and development orders sent out to Koperasi and the developer, the current DAP/Pakatan Rakyat state government was legally bound.

In other words, the DAP/Pakatan Rakyat state government has been powerless to legally stop the land transfer. Both the State Legal Adviser and DAP Chairman and prominent lawyer, Karpal Singh, hold the same view. The Federal Court has subsequently affirmed that there is nothing the DAP/Pakatan Rakyat government can do as it is bound by the decisions approved by the previous administration.

Why has the current DAP/Pakatan Rakyat state government rejected the suggestion that it acquire the land under the Land Acquisition Act?

Based on the current market price, it has been estimated that to forcibly acquire the land would cost the state more than RM100 million, a quarter of the state’s budget of RM371 million. This is a sum that the citizens of Penang simply cannot afford for 24 houses. Those who claim that the acquisition of the Kampung Buah Pala land would cost RM30 million or less are mistaken. Under the law no state government in Malaysia is allowed to acquire land at a sum far below the market price, even for the ‘public interest’.

Why is the current DAP/Pakatan Rakyat state government unable to exchange Kampung Buah Pala land for an alternative piece of land for the developer?

Penang island has limited suitable land for housing development. The current Penang state government had indeed offered few pieces of alternative land for the developer but these have been turned down by the developer. More importantly, most of the housing units with the new development project at Kampung Buah Pala have been sold.

How did the current DAP/Pakatan Rakyat state government save the village from being demolished by the developer?

The current DAP/Pakatan Rakyat government never issued an eviction notice (under emergency laws). All eviction notices were issued by the previous Gerakan/BN government. Furthermore, the Deputy Chief Minister II, Y.B. Professor P. Ramasamy, and state executive council member, Y.B. Abdul Malik bin Abdul Kassim, have stopped the developer from entering the village with bulldozers several times last year when a court order was obtained. It was only because of the efforts of the present DAP/Pakatan Rakyat state government that Kampung Buah Pala still existed until 2009.

Who authorised the developer to demolish the houses?

The developer obtained a court order that allows it to demolish the village. The decision has nothing to do with the DAP/Pakatan Rakyat state government. The state government did not even instruct local council enforcement officers to be involved in the operation. Hence the developer could only proceed with the demolition with the help of the police which is a federal agency.

Why did the current DAP/Pakatan Rakyat state government not defy the court order?

The DAP/Pakatan Rakyat state government is simply not in a position to defy the court order since it governs to uphold the rule of law and is compelled to respect any court order issued. The state government is bound by the decision of the Federal Court.

Does the current DAP/Pakatan Rakyat state government respect the residents’ human rights?

Yes. The DAP/Pakatan Rakyat state government recognises the rights of the residents and their supporters to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly. The Chief Minister, Lim Guan Eng, has instructed state officials to respect these rights and accept any memorandum submitted. To protect the residents, Y.B. Ng Wei Aik, Political Secretary to CM faced police reports and investigations for “obstructing the police in carrying out their duties to arrest the demonstrators”.

What is being offered to the residents by the developer and the current DAP/Pakatan Rakyat state government?

The DAP/Pakatan Rakyat state government has treated the residents as landowners who were allowed to stay by the original British landlord nearly 150 years ago. The state government has worked hard to compel the developer to offer the residents a double-storey terrace house with 99-years lease worth RM600,000 each. The developer has agreed to the state government’s request to share a portion of their land with the residents by offering a 1,200 square feet double-storey terrace house with a built-up area of 1,400 square feet and a 99-years lease.

Read more!

陈嘉亮夜郎自大!

民主行动党槟州社青团秘书黄伟益于2009年10月30日(星期五)在槟城乔治市发表的声明:

民主行动党槟州社青团促请槟州民青团副团长陈嘉亮不要夜郎自大,为了达到其政治宣传目的而不惜夸下海口。

槟州首席部长兼峇眼區国会议员林冠英日前在国会参与辩论2010年度财政预算案时提到,由于我国缺乏工程师,而被逼拒绝一项总额高达300亿令吉的投资计划。

这个投资者要求槟州政府提供1000位电子与电气工程师。由于槟州政府无法提供1000位电子与电气工程师,因此被逼拒绝这项投资计划。

有鉴于此,林冠英建议政府选贤与能,不应以种族和宗教背景来委任要职,以确保所有族群都有机会在国际舞台施展才能。

然而,陈嘉亮却在没有求证的情况下,就选择不相信林冠英口中所说的这项投资计划。他还说:“这1000名工程师,如果林冠英找不到,可交给我,我肯定能够提供1000名工程师,前提是,槟州政府保证能够获得这份投资计划。”

这显示陈嘉亮的无知程度,如今已然到了病入膏肓的地步。林冠英所指的1000名工程师,不是任何领域的工程师,而是对方所指定的电子与电气工程师。

如果通过官方管道找遍整个马来西亚都无法凑足1000名电子与电气工程师,陈嘉亮这号小人物又何德何能做得到呢?

当然,这番话出自槟州首席部长口中,而且林冠英是在国会这种神圣的立法殿堂发表这番言论,试问陈嘉亮怎能在没有凭据的情况下,单凭本身不相信就能抹杀这个事实呢?

社青团严正促请民青团领袖不要一再发表没有根据,甚至夜郎自大的言论。这种言论不仅突显民青团领袖非常严重的无知程度,而且还会引起人民更加反感。

Read more!

Monday 26 October 2009

A ride with CM

Friday 16 October 2009

Happy Deepavali

Wednesday 14 October 2009

一个生命在我面前流逝

2009年10月13日,当我途经日落洞高速公路时,突然发现左方路边站着好几个人,正看着一个人伏靠在电单车道旁的铁杆上。

当时,第一直觉就是有人车祸了,就即刻停下车来打算给予救援。在跑往施救时,还看到受害者的电单车翻覆在距离他有好一段距离的地点。看来,其伤势应该不轻吧!

跑到受害者的伏靠处,我即刻拔电联络自愿治安队队长林天山,要求对方协助召来救伤车;同时,我联络槟州警察总部行动室,要求警方给予施援。当时是上午8时55分!

在场一些人就把受害者抬离伏卧的铁杆,把他放在铁杆旁的草地上。受害者身体严重被刮花,左下边的身体有一道被割得很深,可以清楚看到体肉的伤口。

受害者颈部有一些血迹,其胸口部位呈现柴色,显然有非常严重的内伤。这相信是他翻覆电单车后,整个人被抛向并撞上铁杆而造成的。

在场者把他的钱包搜出时,身分证显示其住在双溪赖。由于受害者的手机也被撞烂了,所以其中一人就把他的手机SIM卡拿出来,装在本身的手机上藉以尝试联络其家人。

当时,受害者双眼还半开且还可以呼吸。只是,他的呼吸很困难,每呼一口气其上身都要震动一番。我一直跟受害者讲话,试图确保受害者不会昏迷,同时抓正其头部并抬高颈骨,以协助受害者呼吸正常。

我们一直很焦急地等候救伤车,包括不断联络中央医院与民防部队,要求他们尽快派救伤车来。曾经一度,当发觉受害者不再呼吸时,我尝试用心脏复苏法与嘴对嘴人工呼吸法要把死者从死亡关拉回来,但一切都显得太迟了。

结果,中央医院的救伤车迟至9时25分才抵达。可是,受害者在时间一分一秒流逝的当儿,生命就这样流逝掉了。面对这种情况,我显得非常无助,更显得十分愤怒:为何我们的救伤车效率如此糟糕?我同样对警方姗姗来迟的效率感到不满!

面对这种情况,我感到很无奈。若不是死者的伤势太严重,担心会伤及其他的身体部位,我们早就用车辆把他载往医院了。可是,等待救伤车救援却要换来苦等的结果。

即使这个死者伤得太重而难以救活,但我们的救伤车还是要最快赶到现场嘛!您总不能说找不到地方就可以迟到,难道医院方面不能再联络拔电者求证吗?

这个受害者是个年轻人,看来只有20多岁。其身材非常瘦,相信根本没有办法承受很大的冲击力,所以才会造成非常严重的内伤。

有人说,这个死者是被另一辆电单车撞及而翻覆,另一说法则是自行翻覆。其中一个住在附近的马来人,宣称这场夺命车祸是在上午8时许发生,而他们亦联络救伤车给予救援。

如果是这样的话,我们的救伤车岂不是迟到超过一小时?这个年轻人的宝贵生命就这样丢了,试问我们整天忙着马华党争的卫生部长又怎样说呢?

Read more!

Tuesday 13 October 2009

Online Public Survey on Road Signs Within Georgetown Heritage Zone 乔冶市古迹区中文路牌繁简网上民意调查

The Chinese (Mandarin) wordings for bilingual road signs within Georgetown Heritage Zone should be exhibited in:
您认为乔治市古迹区内的双语路牌中文字眼应该设为:

- Traditional Chinese 简体
- Simplified Chinese 繁体

Please vote at:
请到这里投票:
http://www.heritageroadsign.com

Read more!